Most medical professionals will say the discovery of streptomycin as a cure accounts for the reduced incidence of the disease in the early 1960s. As a result of this decline, the Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitorium closed in 1974.
In today’s Wall Street Journal, writer Matt Ridley poses an interesting question: Did urban renewal policies of the postwar period reduce the incidence of TB before the antibiotic streptomycin was discovered? The discovery of a cure was a significant breakthrough, of course, but the isolation of patients and the removal of slums may have played an equally important role in reducing the number of cases. As obsolete as the idea of a santorium seems today, it successfully controlled the spread of TB.
In his comments on this subject, Ridley refers to Experiment Eleven by Peter Pringle. I’m looking forward to reading this new book, which isn’t yet released. It tells the little-remembered history of the discovery of streptomycin. Albert Schatz was a young graduate student who made the discovery and then was was robbed of both the credit and monetary rewards of his discovery. Ultimately he was robbed of the Nobel Prize.




